<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foucault&#8217;s Fault</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/foucaults-fault/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/foucaults-fault/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Foucault’s Fault &#171; Remixing Cinema</title>
		<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/foucaults-fault/#comment-3388</link>
		<dc:creator>Foucault’s Fault &#171; Remixing Cinema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 04:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/foucaults-fault/#comment-3388</guid>
		<description>[...] clipped from digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clipped from digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecko4inc</title>
		<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/foucaults-fault/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>ecko4inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 10:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/foucaults-fault/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I remember reading, eons ago, an article (not by Foucault but about him)  in which Foucault talks about Spinoza as a &quot;hidden&quot; philosopher he enters into &quot;dialogue&quot; with, an unacknowledged tradition he owes a lot of his work to.  I can&#039;t remember the source and if you know of this article, I&#039;d appreciate it because its been bugging me for a while and I&#039;ve upturned all my old boxes of notes trying to find the damn thing.

  Anyway, Foucault was basically of the opinion that every writer needs an &quot;unspoken&quot; tradition or interlocutor.  And, of course, there is much resemblance between Spinoza&#039;s Ethics and Foucault&#039;s conception of power as immanent, diffuse, etc. probably in much the same way as his work resembles Weber&#039;s social theory on values and beliefs shaping individual choices in a rational framework - and what constitutes the rational and true in the exercise of human freedom, the processes of subjectification, is the proper object of a political philosophy - such as Foucault&#039;s.  

  Maybe Weber &quot;stole&quot; from Spinoza too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading, eons ago, an article (not by Foucault but about him)  in which Foucault talks about Spinoza as a &#8220;hidden&#8221; philosopher he enters into &#8220;dialogue&#8221; with, an unacknowledged tradition he owes a lot of his work to.  I can&#8217;t remember the source and if you know of this article, I&#8217;d appreciate it because its been bugging me for a while and I&#8217;ve upturned all my old boxes of notes trying to find the damn thing.</p>
<p>  Anyway, Foucault was basically of the opinion that every writer needs an &#8220;unspoken&#8221; tradition or interlocutor.  And, of course, there is much resemblance between Spinoza&#8217;s Ethics and Foucault&#8217;s conception of power as immanent, diffuse, etc. probably in much the same way as his work resembles Weber&#8217;s social theory on values and beliefs shaping individual choices in a rational framework &#8211; and what constitutes the rational and true in the exercise of human freedom, the processes of subjectification, is the proper object of a political philosophy &#8211; such as Foucault&#8217;s.  </p>
<p>  Maybe Weber &#8220;stole&#8221; from Spinoza too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philosophy as fraud &#171; Foucault blog</title>
		<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/foucaults-fault/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Philosophy as fraud &#171; Foucault blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/foucaults-fault/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>[...] 27th, 2007 by Jeremy    This article discusses whether you have to cite your sources: But don’t get confused by this romantic description of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 27th, 2007 by Jeremy    This article discusses whether you have to cite your sources: But don’t get confused by this romantic description of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
