<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe a Monad (Phaedrus by the river)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:46:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lola</title>
		<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-3397</link>
		<dc:creator>lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-3397</guid>
		<description>hi i love the story</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi i love the story</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musthafa</title>
		<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-3390</link>
		<dc:creator>Musthafa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-3390</guid>
		<description>Nice ... What an amazing story
I already posted the same term: Narcissus and Echo. Freud make it outside in sexual difference and outside of linguistic approah. Though Derrida states the different things. Hi...I link your picture to my blog. I ask your permission</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice &#8230; What an amazing story<br />
I already posted the same term: Narcissus and Echo. Freud make it outside in sexual difference and outside of linguistic approah. Though Derrida states the different things. Hi&#8230;I link your picture to my blog. I ask your permission</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wandering Star &#171; I am emale</title>
		<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-3152</link>
		<dc:creator>Wandering Star &#171; I am emale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 02:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-3152</guid>
		<description>[...] of affairs in my (ex-)love life, I am emale - being Muli&#8217;s alter-ecko -  came back to this post, on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of affairs in my (ex-)love life, I am emale &#8211; being Muli&#8217;s alter-ecko -  came back to this post, on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muli koppel</title>
		<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-2285</link>
		<dc:creator>muli koppel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-2285</guid>
		<description>Dear Ecko, other: Flying. Wings. Mirrors. Desire. The dialogue should remain open. Nothing wants to die (except for Socrates).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Ecko, other: Flying. Wings. Mirrors. Desire. The dialogue should remain open. Nothing wants to die (except for Socrates).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecko4inc</title>
		<link>http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-2281</link>
		<dc:creator>ecko4inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalphilosophy.wordpress.com/2007/07/15/maybe-a-monad-phaedrus-by-the-river/#comment-2281</guid>
		<description>&quot;What are we here for?  We&#039;re all here to go into space.  Do I hear any questions about that?!?&quot;
Burroughs

Do I hear any questions?  the end of dialogue.  I have written what I have written.  Entropic death.  Ends and means, &quot;mean, faced Christian sons-of-bitches&quot; if I remember correctly, storing up their riches for the afterlife eternal... like mummied clones.

  Into space.  Flying dreams held a special place in Burroughs&#039; dreams (My Education).  The wings are irrigated by desire (Zeus equates desire with a flow) in Socrates&#039; palinode.

  Desire is stoachistic.  Spinoza calls desire a kind of striving, unconscious of time (Book three of the Ethics).

&quot;Its the same with men
as with horses and dogs
nothing wants to die...
Boys, you&#039;ll have to find your own way home&quot;
Tom Waits, &quot;The Fall of Troy&quot;

  The interesting paradox in Phaedrus is the place of writing, written.  The palinode Socrates gives (ostensibly to the gods) is written by another, (the blind) Stesichorus (whose eyesight was restored after composing the palinode), the son of Euphemus (&quot;fair speaker&quot;).  And the fanciful tale of Thoth and the King of Thebes is fabricated (the creator cannot see the true utility of his creation because he is blinded by love - so says the King of Thebes in refutation to Thoth: &quot;Your invention is a potion for the jogging of the memory, not remembering.&quot;)

 Et in Arcadia ego.  
Monad - body and soul.  
Relation to self.  Techne.  Art.
The body signified &quot; - and often I have asked myself whether, taking a large view, philosophy has not been merely an interpretation of the body and a misunderstanding of the body.&quot;  Nietzsche, The Gay Science.
&quot;L&#039;art pour l&#039;art...&quot; Twilight of the Idols.  The image signifier... 

Truth, Beauty, Love.  
Substance, Modes, Attributes.  
Philosophy&#039;s object remains the same: the eternal recurrence of the same.

  A hard saying.  Nothing wants to die.  Like Ovid&#039;s Metamorphoses, it can be forgotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What are we here for?  We&#8217;re all here to go into space.  Do I hear any questions about that?!?&#8221;<br />
Burroughs</p>
<p>Do I hear any questions?  the end of dialogue.  I have written what I have written.  Entropic death.  Ends and means, &#8220;mean, faced Christian sons-of-bitches&#8221; if I remember correctly, storing up their riches for the afterlife eternal&#8230; like mummied clones.</p>
<p>  Into space.  Flying dreams held a special place in Burroughs&#8217; dreams (My Education).  The wings are irrigated by desire (Zeus equates desire with a flow) in Socrates&#8217; palinode.</p>
<p>  Desire is stoachistic.  Spinoza calls desire a kind of striving, unconscious of time (Book three of the Ethics).</p>
<p>&#8220;Its the same with men<br />
as with horses and dogs<br />
nothing wants to die&#8230;<br />
Boys, you&#8217;ll have to find your own way home&#8221;<br />
Tom Waits, &#8220;The Fall of Troy&#8221;</p>
<p>  The interesting paradox in Phaedrus is the place of writing, written.  The palinode Socrates gives (ostensibly to the gods) is written by another, (the blind) Stesichorus (whose eyesight was restored after composing the palinode), the son of Euphemus (&#8220;fair speaker&#8221;).  And the fanciful tale of Thoth and the King of Thebes is fabricated (the creator cannot see the true utility of his creation because he is blinded by love &#8211; so says the King of Thebes in refutation to Thoth: &#8220;Your invention is a potion for the jogging of the memory, not remembering.&#8221;)</p>
<p> Et in Arcadia ego.<br />
Monad &#8211; body and soul.<br />
Relation to self.  Techne.  Art.<br />
The body signified &#8221; &#8211; and often I have asked myself whether, taking a large view, philosophy has not been merely an interpretation of the body and a misunderstanding of the body.&#8221;  Nietzsche, The Gay Science.<br />
&#8220;L&#8217;art pour l&#8217;art&#8230;&#8221; Twilight of the Idols.  The image signifier&#8230; </p>
<p>Truth, Beauty, Love.<br />
Substance, Modes, Attributes.<br />
Philosophy&#8217;s object remains the same: the eternal recurrence of the same.</p>
<p>  A hard saying.  Nothing wants to die.  Like Ovid&#8217;s Metamorphoses, it can be forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
